TI中文支持网
TI专业的中文技术问题搜集分享网站

SN74AVC32T245: What Factors has most significant impact on propagation delay (PPD)? And if given these factors to fix values, does PPD diverse between channel to channel and component to component?

Part Number:SN74AVC32T245

We plan to use  SN74AVC32T245 for 100MHz operating clock parallel interface, connecting to Xilinx FPGA HP bank LVCMOS1.8V IO and an ASIC with LVCMOS 3.3V.

We noticed in the datahsheet it claimed 3.3V to 1.8V translate genrates 0.5-4.4ns Propagation delay and the oppsited direction generates 0.5ns-3.3ns.

I'd like to consult what factor contribute most to the the range of propagation delay? 

Is that temperature and output load capacitor? Since I see most of the datahsheet have note that this range is based on operating temp range.

 

And I also saw the curve, if given fixed temperature, C load = 10pf increse to 60pf result in about  1ns PPD delay increase. 

So in other word, say we are using 6 chips x 32 bit, we are care about the diverse between channel to channel and component to component.

If we are given fixed working temperature, and the same type connected I/O (e.g., all is connected to FPGA  same bank same type I/O), and similar PCB trace routing.

Can we say we won't have any significant PPD diversity within channels, and components (much smaller thant the range such as 0.5ns-4.4ns)?  If yes ,could you suggest how much is the diversity in this case?

You can answer me either in Chinese or English ,thanks much!

Vivian Gao:

您好

感谢您对TI产品的关注!为更加有效地解决您的问题,我们建议您将问题发布在E2E英文技术论坛上(TI E2E support forums),将由资深的英文论坛工程师为您提供帮助

赞(0)
未经允许不得转载:TI中文支持网 » SN74AVC32T245: What Factors has most significant impact on propagation delay (PPD)? And if given these factors to fix values, does PPD diverse between channel to channel and component to component?
分享到: 更多 (0)