TI中文支持网
TI专业的中文技术问题搜集分享网站

TMDSHVMTRPFCKIT 与ccs连接不上

我有两个TMDSHVMTRPFCKI套件,之前一个配置好了可以与CCS正常连接,但是换了一个新的就不能了,出现了一下错误,为什么呢,请问怎么解决?

Susan Yang:您是否有在 target configuration里test connection 一下?结果如何?

也可以先参考下

software-dl.ti.com/…/ccsv7_debugging_jtag_connectivity_issues.html

我有两个TMDSHVMTRPFCKI套件,之前一个配置好了可以与CCS正常连接,但是换了一个新的就不能了,出现了一下错误,为什么呢,请问怎么解决?

user6159132:

回复 Susan Yang:

[Start]

Execute the command:

%ccs_base%/common/uscif/dbgjtag -f %boarddatafile% -rv -o -F inform,logfile=yes -S pathlength -S integrity

[Result]

—–[Print the board config pathname(s)]————————————

C:\Users\cxp\AppData\Local\.TI\4084209646\0\0\BrdDat\testBoard.dat

—–[Print the reset-command software log-file]—————————–

This utility has selected a 100- or 510-class product.
This utility will load the adapter 'jioserdesusb.dll'.
The library build date was 'Aug 20 2013'.
The library build time was '22:56:19'.
The library package version is '5.1.232.0'.
The library component version is '35.34.40.0'.
The controller does not use a programmable FPGA.
The controller has a version number of '4' (0x00000004).
The controller has an insertion length of '0' (0x00000000).
This utility will attempt to reset the controller.
This utility has successfully reset the controller.

—–[Print the reset-command hardware log-file]—————————–

The scan-path will be reset by toggling the JTAG TRST signal.
The controller is the FTDI FT2232 with USB interface.
The link from controller to target is direct (without cable).
The software is configured for FTDI FT2232 features.
The controller cannot monitor the value on the EMU[0] pin.
The controller cannot monitor the value on the EMU[1] pin.
The controller cannot control the timing on output pins.
The controller cannot control the timing on input pins.
The scan-path link-delay has been set to exactly '0' (0x0000).

—–[The log-file for the JTAG TCLK output generated from the PLL]———-

There is no hardware for programming the JTAG TCLK frequency.

—–[Measure the source and frequency of the final JTAG TCLKR input]——–

There is no hardware for measuring the JTAG TCLK frequency.

—–[Perform the standard path-length test on the JTAG IR and DR]———–

This path-length test uses blocks of 512 32-bit words.

The test for the JTAG IR instruction path-length failed.
The JTAG IR instruction scan-path is stuck-at-ones.

The test for the JTAG DR bypass path-length failed.
The JTAG DR bypass scan-path is stuck-at-ones.

—–[Perform the Integrity scan-test on the JTAG IR]————————

This test will use blocks of 512 32-bit words.
This test will be applied just once.

Do a test using 0xFFFFFFFF.
Scan tests: 1, skipped: 0, failed: 0
Do a test using 0x00000000.
Test 2 Word 0: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 1: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 2: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 3: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 4: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 5: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 6: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 7: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
The details of the first 8 errors have been provided.
The utility will now report only the count of failed tests.
Scan tests: 2, skipped: 0, failed: 1
Do a test using 0xFE03E0E2.
Scan tests: 3, skipped: 0, failed: 2
Do a test using 0x01FC1F1D.
Scan tests: 4, skipped: 0, failed: 3
Do a test using 0x5533CCAA.
Scan tests: 5, skipped: 0, failed: 4
Do a test using 0xAACC3355.
Scan tests: 6, skipped: 0, failed: 5
Some of the values were corrupted – 83.3 percent.

The JTAG IR Integrity scan-test has failed.

—–[Perform the Integrity scan-test on the JTAG DR]————————

This test will use blocks of 512 32-bit words.
This test will be applied just once.

Do a test using 0xFFFFFFFF.
Scan tests: 1, skipped: 0, failed: 0
Do a test using 0x00000000.
Test 2 Word 0: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 1: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 2: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 3: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 4: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 5: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 6: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
Test 2 Word 7: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0xFFFFFFFF.
The details of the first 8 errors have been provided.
The utility will now report only the count of failed tests.
Scan tests: 2, skipped: 0, failed: 1
Do a test using 0xFE03E0E2.
Scan tests: 3, skipped: 0, failed: 2
Do a test using 0x01FC1F1D.
Scan tests: 4, skipped: 0, failed: 3
Do a test using 0x5533CCAA.
Scan tests: 5, skipped: 0, failed: 4
Do a test using 0xAACC3355.
Scan tests: 6, skipped: 0, failed: 5
Some of the values were corrupted – 83.3 percent.

The JTAG DR Integrity scan-test has failed.

[End]

我有两个TMDSHVMTRPFCKI套件,之前一个配置好了可以与CCS正常连接,但是换了一个新的就不能了,出现了一下错误,为什么呢,请问怎么解决?

Susan Yang:

回复 user6159132:

我明天测试一下,请问您现在跳线是否都设置正确?

如如果需要从JTAG调试,我们需要填充J9跳线。

我有两个TMDSHVMTRPFCKI套件,之前一个配置好了可以与CCS正常连接,但是换了一个新的就不能了,出现了一下错误,为什么呢,请问怎么解决?

user6159132:

回复 Susan Yang:

你好,请问怎么解决啊?我有两个控制器,原先一个可以正常使用,我换了一个新的,就不行,接线都是一样的。

我有两个TMDSHVMTRPFCKI套件,之前一个配置好了可以与CCS正常连接,但是换了一个新的就不能了,出现了一下错误,为什么呢,请问怎么解决?

user6159132:

回复 Susan Yang:

刚观察了一下,为什么控制卡的灯不亮?

我有两个TMDSHVMTRPFCKI套件,之前一个配置好了可以与CCS正常连接,但是换了一个新的就不能了,出现了一下错误,为什么呢,请问怎么解决?

Susan Yang:

回复 user6159132:

能否测量一下控制卡的电压?看是否正常供电?

另外您是何时在何处购买的?

赞(0)
未经允许不得转载:TI中文支持网 » TMDSHVMTRPFCKIT 与ccs连接不上
分享到: 更多 (0)